rhondacrockett: (Weird is rad)
This Monday, I like... ironing.

I Like Monday - ironing photo ironing_zps1e7f2bdb.jpg
Image taken from the Lakeland website.


Confession: I am very lazy when it comes to housework. I only clean up the kitchen and make my bed because this is stuff that has to be done every day or it will be the end of civilisation as we know it. Anything that can be left for a while - laundry, hoovering, dusting, cleaning windows etc. - I am completely blind to. The number of times my mum has grumbled, "Did you not see that X was to do?" - no, Mum, I didn't, I was far too busy reading a book/watching TV/on the internet/indulging the fantasies in my head. I heartily dislike most household tasks too. Dusting? You have to move so many things in order to do it properly, and then you have to put them back again. Cleaning the bathroom? When you rinse out the brush, the cleaner gets washed away before it's done its job. My particular bugbear is hoovering, UGH, I cannot STAND hoovering!!!!

There is one chore, however, that I do enjoy: ironing. Maybe it's the precision of getting the seams lined up and the fabric laid out taut, which appeals to the perfectionist in me. Maybe it's the instantaneous satisfaction of seeing the creases disappear under a cloud of steam. Maybe it's the comforting heat, the soft sound of the steam or the soothing rhythm of pushing the iron back and forth. Maybe it's the knowledge that this is the very last task to be done with these clothes, the end of the laundry sequence. Maybe it's the fact that I can sit down to do it! Whatever the reason, I could spend whole evenings happily ironing away.

And my particular favourite garment of all to iron? Shirts. Yes, shirts. I flatter myself that I'm something of an expert at them and I always save them for the end of any ironing session. To iron a shirt you have to treat it as five different bits: collar, arms, front right panel, front left panel, and back panel. A lot of people find this frustrating but I enjoy the routine of it, and the satisfaction of working around those awkward seams and folds to produce a flawlessly pressed shirt. If anything, I am over-fussy about shirts and will spend a lot of time making sure that I'm happy with the final result.

And lastly, doing the ironing gets me out of doing the hated hoovering. My mum hates ironing but loves hoovering, so she's more than happy to swap chores. The work gets done, neither of us has to do a chore we hate: everybody wins! :DDD
rhondacrockett: (scribble scribble)
This Monday, I like... naming the models in hairstyle magazines.

I Like Monday - hairstyle models photo Hairstyle-Showcase-Summer-2013-cover_zpsf454687b.jpg
Edited from an image originally taken from It's a 10 Haircare blog The individual photos are copyright of the original photographers and stylists.

I'm not a fan of women's magazines. They are either salacious gossip/fawning glurge about "celebrities" I don't recognise, or else they're salacious gossip/fawning glurge about "real-life" folk looking for their five seconds of "fame". Just looking at the front covers, I can feel my IQ start to drop.

But I make an exception for hairstyle magazines. No mention of break-ups or drug addictions or new mansions. Nothing about cheating death or boob jobs or finding out your husband is a bigamist. They have a very simple, straightforward focus: what does your hair look like and how can you make it look better? It's shallow, yes, but it's a clean shallow that doesn't leave me feeling like my brain's been wallowing in a stranger's pig sty. The writing (if there is any at all) is minimal, while the tone is cheerful and helpful rather than mean-spirited or scandalised. And while "celebrities" feature, the vast majority of the photographs are of anonymous models like those above. Nobody expects you to know what they are called. Nobody expects you to know who they're going out with/breaking up with/having a cat-fight with. Nobody expects any story about them at all.

Which makes them irresistable to someone who likes making up stories. Their faces are a blank canvas upon which I can impose any name, any character, any backstory I desire. It's a casual thing, more of a game I play with myself than a serious creative exercise. I've never written any story inspired by a hair magazine model. But it's fun, studying each face for hints of personality, suggestions of lives that aren't about modelling. Take the redhead on the far left: a sultry little madam, I reckon she's a jewel thief in the 1960s, who has arrived in Italy for her next job; she's been all around the world but is originally from Wales and still has the soft, lilting accent; clever and self-sufficient, but with a thrill-seeking streak that can make her careless when on the job. I think I'll call her either Branwen or Caron. And the two brunettes? Now they could be the same model photographed with two different hairstyles, but I don't think so; the one on the far right has a bigger nose than the one in the middle. But they're pretty similar-looking so I could cast them as sisters. I reckon the one on the right is the elder, we'll call her Danni, and the one in the middle is Jean, they both love swimming and Jean is competing at college/university level and thinking of turning pro.

Well, you get the idea. And within one magazine there are so many photographs, all opportunities to go on wild flights of fancy. You don't have to stick to the one story or name all the time. Maybe I'll come across the photo of the redhead on another day and decide she's actually a dancer or a nurse or a Southern belle. It's quick and easy story-telling on the go.
rhondacrockett: (Lookit me)
This Monday, I like... Latin.

I Like Monday - Cornelia and Flavia photo ILikeMonday-CorneliaandFlavia_zps4a793062.jpg
Image scanned from Ecce Romani 1: Meeting the Family (2nd ed, Oliver & Boyd : 1982), copyright the Scottish Classics Group, illustrations by Peter Dennis, Trevor Parkin and Hamish Gordon. Used without permission, not for profit and with no intention to impinge on anybody else's legal rights. Please don't sue me!


Socially, secondary school* was not a good time for me; suffice to say I had a very big culture shock upon starting which drove a wedge between my contemporaries and me. But oh! how I loved the work! And amongst the standard English, maths, etc., there was my new favourite subject: the dead language of an ancient empire.

It started with my first lesson and the picture above. It accompanied a short and not-terribly-exciting paragraph about a Roman girl called Cornelia sitting under a tree and her best friend Flavia, who was singing for no particular reason. Having translated the paragraph with just a handful of vocabulary, and no clue yet about things like cases, participles or conjugations, we then answered some comprehension questions written in Latin: simple stuff which only required us to either copy directly from the paragraph or swap a few words around. But then our teacher added a question of her own, which she told us to answer in Latin: "ubi est Flavia?" - where is Flavia?

Most people went with "Flavia est sub arbore" - Flavia is under the tree - although the paragraph never specified that Flavia was under the tree, just Cornelia, and in the picture she seems to standing a little distance out. Others gave a more sweeping answer: "Flavia est in Italia" - you can translate that one for yourselves - but it seemed too general for me. A few went with the plain wrong: "Flavia est in (vicina) villa" - Flavia is in the (neighbouring) villa - certainly the paragraph said that was where she lived, but that wasn't where she was.

Then I saw it, right there in plain sight: "ecce! in pictura est puella, nomine Cornelia. ...etiam in pictura est altera puella, nomine Flavia."

So that was my answer: "Flavia est in pictura" - Flavia is in the picture. And I was hooked.

I always knew it was an impractical subject that would never get me anywhere. The "transferable skills" they tried to sell us about problem-solving skills, methodical reasoning, data analysis and verbal comprehension, were the same you could supposedly get from every other subject on the curriculum. At each major examination stage - GCSE, A-level, undergraduate degree - I considered giving it up. But I just enjoyed it too much! Only when I reached postgraduate level and could pursue only one subject, did I finally let it go, first for the Creative Writing MA and then the nightmarish PhD. (And that's how I ended up with the most unemployable set of qualifications ever!)

As to why I liked it, that's harder to say. I had a talent for it, sure, that helped. I have an interest in classical mythology and history. Having always loved English, learning about grammar in greater, systematic depth was fascinating. Translation was like the best word puzzle ever, and prose composition - turning English into Latin - was the best word puzzle squared. :D Looking back, I suspect that it helped that it was a purely written language. I always hated French orals - no such problem in Latin!

Of course, my knowledge these days is extremely rusty; I doubt I could translate any real Roman text without taking a refresher course first, and I certainly couldn't do any prose composition. But I will always look back on the subject - and on Flavia - with great fondness.





* Secondary school: the second level of formal education in the UK, from ages 11 to at least 16, at which age you can choose to leave education altogether. Here in Northern Ireland, however, most secondary schools will include students up to 18.
rhondacrockett: (Lookit me)
This Monday, I like... cleaning my teeth.

I Like Monday - toothbrush photo 4316064-946475-toothbrush-and-toothpaste_zps3ce31aa5.jpg
Image taken from Colourbox.com


...What are all the odd looks for? I'm serious; I like cleaning my teeth. It's one of the most relaxing activities I know. You stand there daydreaming, or maybe take a lazy dander about the bathroom, or lean against a warm radiator, just letting instinct guide the brush around your mouth. The old, dirty tastes of the day all disappear under the thick, minty-fresh foam of toothpaste. That unpleasant, slightly furry scum clinging to your back molars is scrubbed off to leave smooth enamel. Your gums get a thorough massaging and there's something viscerally satisfying about being able to spit in (almost) public.

They say that brushing your teeth should take at least two minutes. I probably take closer to five, myself. I find it easy to lose track of the time when cleaning my teeth. I can let my mind drift; the day is over, there's nothing left to do except to go to sleep. The noise of the brush scrubbing away is like the sound of sea waves, soothing in its regularity and the soft changes of pitch as I move from the back teeth to the front. Then one final swish of cold water to clean out the last of the froth, wipe a towel across my lips, and I'm all ready for bed. It's the perfect wind-down.
rhondacrockett: (Default)
Interests meme )

Woohoo! I'm rare, me!

Does that mean I have to go on an endangered species list and get official government protection? XD

I also did that handwriting meme thing but I'll post it some other time.
rhondacrockett: (Lookit me)
Ooooh! This is niiiiiicccce. *Settles in* It's all velvety and maroonish and decadent-esque. Makes me think of deep fur throws and satin bed sheets, heheh >:) And I like my title change *looks pleased* Aww, I love Eed. She makes me feel speshafull!

Was phoning some landlords last night, and I may have found an apartment on Ulsterville!!! I walk past it all the time, so I stopped this morning to have a good look at it. It looks sound enough from the outside, and it has nice large windows, which means high ceilings, which means it should feel pretty roomy, yay! Ooh, ooh, and it has a little balcony-type thing! *Ska-wheel!* (:DDDDDDDDD You can crawl out the window and sit on top of someone else's window lol! It'll be £210 a month, which isn't so bad; I won't begrudge them the extra tenner if it's a good place. And damn, will it be easy to move to! It's just round the corner and up the road a bit.

The only thing I didn't like about the outside was that it didn't have any fence/hedge/wall to enclose the front yard, but meh, I can live with it, it's the top floor apartment so the lack of something to hide behind is not my problem.

I promised myself I wouldn't get too excited in case the inside is completely shitty, but it looks so nice from the outside, and the area is good, and it's just so damn convenient all round, that I can't help getting my hopes up.

On a completely different note, I lost another unique interest, "19th century britain" to some girl. But I'm ok with it this time, cos I replaced it with another unique interest: "joe pantoliano's sexy hat!" >:DDDD

DAMMIT!!!

Mar. 1st, 2004 05:05 pm
rhondacrockett: (Lookit me)
I just lost one of my unique interests :(

I feel like a part of me has been violated.
rhondacrockett: (Default)
Editing my userinfo, I discovered that I have TWELVE interests completely unique to me!!! See? I KNEW I was an original! :P

Anyway, Oscars. Yes, Rhonda stayed up to watch them live, from 12.50 to about 5 am GMT. (I lay down and shut my eyes during what, in America, were the ad breaks, and what, on the BBC, was Jonathon "I can't pwonounce my R's" Ross talking with Alistair McGowan, Ronni Anconi and Rob Brydon.) Yay, LotR got Best Film!!!! And there I was being cynical.

However, while I believe that it deserved Best Film, I don't think it deserved everything it got. For instance, in my opinion, Best Song should have gone to "Scarlet Tide" or "A Kiss at the End of the Rainbow." And there should be a prize for Best Performance of an Oscar-nominated Song at the Award Ceremony, cos that would have gone to "Belleville Rendez-vous." Feather boas! Chorus singers! Funky dancing! Frenchmen playing the bicycle! That's what we want from our Oscars! (BTW, Americans: what's with renaming that movie "The Triplets of Belleville"? What was wrong with "Belleville Rendez-vous"?)

Funniest bits: Billy Crystal's film montage and song medley at the beginning, Ben Stiller and Owen Wilson's two-hander (both pre- and during the show), Robin Williams, the "what they're really thinking" bit ("Pusshy Galore... I jusht got it! That'sh VULGER!"), and Adrian Brody and his breath-freshener.

Person I wanted to slap the most: Charlize Theron. Shut up. Just... shut up.

And: was Bill Murray really upset about the Best Actor Oscar? I didn't think he looked it, but everyone was talking about how mad he was.

On a completely different note, happy St David's Day!

Profile

rhondacrockett: (Default)
rhondacrockett

January 2018

S M T W T F S
 12 34 5 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 01:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios