rhondacrockett: (Default)
rhondacrockett ([personal profile] rhondacrockett) wrote 2005-02-10 03:31 pm (UTC)

Hmm, I dunno. The precedent is that if you marry a divorcee, you can't be king, and I know there's a general feeling that Charles ought to give up his claim anyway and let the crown pass to William. We'll see, I suppose. It doesn't make that big a difference anyway.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting